White Media: Protector of White SupremacyBy FinalCall.com News | Last updated: Sep 3, 2014 - 8:40:40 AM
FERGUSON, Mo. - There is an old adage about freedom of the press: Freedom of speech belongs to those who can afford it.
We could add “freedom” of the press belongs to those who control it and we need to understand the press role as a major partner, backer and participant in the oppression of Blacks and framing of racial issues.
White media outlets, CNN and those following CNN in particular, spun the story of the audio recording that captured shots fired by officer Darren Wilson in his confrontation with Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenager.
The two friends terrified, flee. The officer shoots, Mike Mike is hit. Mike Mike turns with his hands up. Witnesses, public witnesses, say his hands were up and he was in a surrender position. They all say the officer pauses and keeps shooting. The line of shots and their concentration fits the eyewitness accounts.
• Perhaps the officer was reloading. That never came up from witnesses, that is conjecture.
• Michael was rushing the officer. Again intentional lying and framing the scenario. There was never any account early on that the young man was charging an armed officer. So a young man runs away from an armed officer who is shooting, then turns around and charges the same armed officer?
• Their audio was suspect because it surfaced two weeks into the crisis in Ferguson, said CNN experts, mainly former law enforcement or those connected with the police and prosecutorial industrial complex. This is one-sided analysis from those who see things through a single lens. Audio two weeks late? It was CNN’s fault. According to CNN host Don Lemon, the tape was given to a CNN producer in Ferguson, Mo., and the person who gave the audiotape thought the tape was going to Mr. Lemon. There was some kind of mix up and the audiotape languished until it surfaced a couple days ago.
• The officer was possibly hurt and trying to recover, White media experts say. But that lie has already been debunked by CNN, which said a report of eye injuries to Mr. Wilson on an x-ray were untrue.
The major media gives information and at times reports accurately, at times the reporting is suspect, and the analysis is ubiqituous and off-base, and Black experts rarely seem willing to challenge, confront or correct their White counterparts who are in error, uttering half-truths and painting pictures that make no sense.
• If anchors and analysts are not prepared, or weakly prepared, or lean toward the police view, the analysis of that moment—which seemed to be intent on raising doubt about the audiotape—drowned out other voices and could be seen as true by viewers. Many of whom are not drawing a clear distinction between straight reporting and someone’s opinion.
It is criminal and irresponsible that CNN and other “responsible” media outlets tried to equate a single anonymous radio interview from “Josie,” a reported friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend of Officer Wilson who heard about how he was attacked and responded with eyewitness accounts and video from Blacks who live in the community and could easily be targeted by police. While Josie hid, spoke and was elevated to the place of a credible witness, she is not credible. Does she even exist at all? Then law enforcement sources, the same sources who Black people don’t and should not trust, are used by White media to verify her account. This is like going to players on the same team and asking one team member to vouch for his teammate.
What happened to the old standard of media skepticism, questioning authority and a predisposition to recognize those in power have a tendency to withhold truth and cover up? We still don’t have a police report from the actual shooting incident.
We have seen the police and prosecution industrial complex galvanize and the attempt to tarnish and slander the shooting victim. The Ferguson police chief showed an image from a video that purported to be Mike Mike leaving a store and in a disagreement with a shop owner. The chief, who later admitted the image had nothing to do with the conflict with officer Wilson and was relieved of his command, described the store incident as a strong arm robbery. This power figure in the White establishment felt safe and secure in spewing this slander.
As attorney Benjamin Crump told Lemon, the only witnesses are those who have come forward on the record, spoken with media and law enforcement and whose accounts and motivations are being investigated.
The owner of the tape was not an unknown person. The owner of the tape has a lawyer and has been questioned by the FBI. While his public identity was not known, he is known to law enforcement and would surely face prosecution if he faked the tape.
Why is the media so concerned?
Officer Wilson represents the established White Power structure and the structure that controls the lives of Black people, especially with these small police departments that dot the suburbs around St. Louis. He must be vindicated because if he is not vindicated, then the system of White Superiority is exposed. Not the silly framing of race usually given but an entire system constructed to protect and benefit Whites and control Black behavior—both consciously and subconsciously as Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, author and brilliant psychologist, notes.
The White Media, for all its talk of ethics and integrity, is part of the same power structure and must protect White interests. Accept their misinformation at your own risk.