Home | Subscribe To The Final Call | Books & Tapes e-Store| Letters/Contact Us | TV & Radio  

Last Updated: May 21st, 2008 

Front Page 
 
  Minister Louis Farrakhan
 
  National News
 
  World News
 
  Perspectives
 
  Columns
 
  Business & Money
 
  Entertainment News
 
  Health & Fitness
 
  Modern Technology
 
  Features
 
  Finalcall.com Español




Subscribe to FCN E-List

Enter email address:

Email Delivery Format:
HTML  Plain Text
Manage Your Subscription



FCN Webcast:
The Havana Cuba
Press Conference

FCN, March 27, 2006





Painting terrorists: More news from Somalia
By Bill Fletcher Jr.
-Guest Columnist-
Updated Apr 29, 2008, 09:33 am

What's your opinion on this article?

Email this article
 Printable page

Bush’s so-called war against terrorism entered a further, cynical stage with the recent classification of a Somali group as alleged “terrorists.” Al Shabab, the military wing of the Union of Islamic Courts, was declared by the State Department to be a terrorist organization. The Bush administration claims that some members of Al Shabab are affiliated with al-Qaeda.

In order to understand the cynicism of this move it is important to remember that Somalia was a basket case for over a decade after the overthrow of dictator Siad Barre. Filled with clan-based warlords, the country had no stable government. An international attempt to forge a transitional national government resulted in no further stability or end to the violence.

The rise of a right-wing Islamist group known as the Union of Islamic Courts, however, brought about a period of relative stability and internal peace. While the group was and is ultra-conservative in many of its tenets, it was successful in crushing or co-opting many of the warlords. Further, it was an indigenous group to Somalia and not an arm of another country or an external social movement.

Using the pretext of an alleged, and unproven, connection between the Union of Islamic Courts and Al Qaeda, Ethiopian troops—encouraged and backed by the Bush administration—invaded Somalia in 2006 with the stated objective of supporting the Transitional National Government, an institution that was on its last legs, and had little support within the population. Though the Ethiopians defeated the Union of Islamic Courts in formal battle, the situation in Somalia devolved into guerrilla war and chaos. The situation has been going downhill ever since.

Al Shabab, whether one supports it or not, is an armed resistance movement. It has been carrying out military actions against troops of the country that invaded Somalia. One does not have to support the Union of Islamic Courts or the actions of Al Shabab to recognize that a people have a right to oust those who invade their land.

The Bush administration’s action in classifying Al Shabab as “terrorists” further complicates an already difficult situation. As opposed to recognizing that Al Shabab is the military wing of a legitimate movement, classifying them as alleged terrorists makes efforts towards a political resolution of the conflict unlikely, if not nearly impossible, just as has happened in Iraq. One does not have to like Al Shabab, or agree with its objectives, as long as it can be demonstrated on the ground that this is a movement that has a real constituency and is militarily confronting an occupying army.

The Bush administration, as it has done in other parts of the world, e.g., in Turkey with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), in the Philippines with the Communist Party of the Philippines (and their New People’s Army), selectively chooses when to classify an insurgency or resistance as terrorist-based almost solely according to whether the target of the insurgency/resistance is a friend of the Bush administration. In the case of Somalia, the Ethiopians are doing the bidding of the Bush administration as well as serving their own regional ambitions.

There is another piece to this which is worth noting. Throwing around the label of ìterroristî is also aimed at suppressing dissent here at home in the USA. Whether one is a Somali, Somali American, or simply someone who supports Somalia’s right to national self-determination, the label of terrorist has a chilling effect on one’s willingness to speak out. As witnessed during the Cold War with the manner in which the charge of “communist sympathizer” was used to suppress dissent, the suggestion that someone is either soft on terrorism or, worse, aiding and abetting an alleged terrorist group shuts down all reasonable discussion.

So, let’s be clear: the Bush administration is not interested in reasonable discussion. We, however, should be, so we need to push back against this latest outrage.

Bill Fletcher, Jr. is a senior scholar with the Institute for Policy Studies and the immediate past president of TransAfrica Forum. He can be reached at papaq54@ hotmail.com. This column was distributed by NNPA.

FCN is a distributor (and not a publisher) of content supplied by third parties. Original content supplied by FCN and FinalCall.com News is Copyright © 2008 FCN Publishing, FinalCall.com. Content supplied by third parties are the property of their respective owners.

Top of Page

Perspectives
Latest Headlines
Shame on America’s battlefields and bases
McCain Seeks to Ban Affirmative Action in Arizona
'Returning power to the people'
The Origins of ‘Being Black in America’
Bio-fuels and their impact on the African world
In defense of Michael McGee, Jr.
Hip Hop Lives! Strong Voices Must Be Supported
The psychological implications of using the ‘N’ Word
Group plans Black agenda for new administration
The Fist of the ’68 Olympics
Plantation Firestone Signs of Victory and Hope
It’s Long Enough!
M.U.I. Launches N.O.I. Jr. Staff Development Program
Racial Profiling: 'Counterproductive, Patently Illegal'
New leadership, opportunity for NAACP, Black America