'Less-than-lethal
weapons:'
A deadly, or safe alternative
by Saeed Shabazz
Staff Writer |
NEW YORK (FinalCall.com)�When demonstrators take to the streets
of Los Angeles for the Democratic National Convention, Aug. 14-17, they
can expect pepper spray and rubber bullets, if they get out of control.
Police Chief Bernard Parks shared his crowd control
plans with the media after courts ruled the city could not limit
protests. The chief�s remarks after the July 24 legal decision are
another example of how law enforcement is moving toward the use of
so-called non-lethal weapons to control crime. The idea is to utilize
alternatives to live ammunition, batons and physical force by officers,
and avoid deaths, say its advocates.
Its detractors say non-lethal weapons can be just as
deadly as traditional weapons and more research needs to be done. They
cite instances in which civilians have died at the hands of officers
using pepper spray and other tools that aren�t supposed to kill
people.
The pepper spray East Orange, N.J., police officers
used on Earl Faison was supposed to subdue him. It may have helped kill
him.
Five officers were indicted June 21 for federal civil
rights violations, bringing attention to the Faison death last April.
According to the indictment, pepper spray was sprayed
into Mr. Faison�s nose and mouth while he was handcuffed. Officers are
also accused of beating and kicking him, and lying about what happened.
U.S. Attorney Robert J. Cleary has declined to specify a cause of death,
and a full medical examiner�s report is not yet public.
One larger issue in the Faison death is use of the
chemical compound oleoresin capsicum, or "OC," which is an
inflammatory agent derived from the cayenne pepper plant. It disables by
causing the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose and throat to swell and
close, temporarily constricting airways and paralyzing the larynx.
" �Non-lethal� is a contradiction in
terms," said Jen Corlew, a spokesperson for Amnesty International,
in a telephone interview from the human rights group�s offices in
Washington, D.C.
In a report issued last year, the group documented
instances where 70 people died after being subjected to OC spray during
arrest or in police custody. The report, "Cruelty in Control: The
Stun Belt and other Electro-shock Equipment in Law Enforcement,"
noted that last August, police in Tucson, Ariz. stopped using OC spray
after one suspect died and another was hospitalized.
While non-lethal tools are needed to lessen the risk
of death from firearms or other weapons, in most cases use of weapons
like pepper sprays is not monitored, Ms. Corlew said. Amnesty has also
raised concerns about other weapons, like stun belts. The device is
wrapped around prisoners and an electrical charge forces prisoners to
obey.
There is no perfect less-than-lethal weapon that
satisfies all scenarios and requirements, argues the federal government�s
National Institute of Justice. "We are trying to help by providing
options," said Sandy Newett of the institute�s Office of Science
and Technology. The institute has said its less than lethal weapon
program hopes to minimize injuries during policing to save lives of
officers, corrections employees and the public.
The National Institute of Justice said law
enforcement and corrections departments are considering blunt impact
projectiles, pepper sprays, baton-launched nets and a laser dazzler that
can be used to disorient suspects and prisoners.
All weapons are tested before use and the institute
is looking at the legal and social issues around less than lethal
weapons, said Ms. Newett.
Even a name change from "non-lethal" to
"less than lethal" weapons is part of law enforcement and
manufacturer efforts.
"By using the term less-than-lethal, we reduce
the criminal liability suits against police, sheriffs, and correction
departments," said Steve Tuttle, a spokesperson for Taser
International, in San Diego, Calif. Taser International manufactures and
distributes the M26 Taser, a gun which discharges two electric
projectiles into the flesh of a suspect or prisoner.
For Ray Winbush, director of the Race Relations
Institute at Fisk University, so-called "non-lethal weapons"
are as ominous as the fatal police shooting of Muslim immigrant Amadou
Diallo in New York. Four white policemen involved were acquitted of
murder charges in that incident.
Some may argue that non-lethal weapons are an
alternative to deadly force, but that still doesn�t confront issues of
police misconduct and racism in law enforcement, he said.
If officers have a racist mentality, any weapon can
be lethal and Blacks and Latinos will still be abused, he warns.
Dr. Ed Liszka, director of the Institute for
Non-Lethal Defense Technologies at Penn State University, said there
needs to be a discussion of new weapons technology.
"If we don�t go after this issue in a
responsible way�if we are not careful�no one will be willing to
approach what we feel is the necessary alternative to lethal
force," he warns.
For a year and a half, Dr. Liszka and his staff have
been working on ways to prepare the public for such a debate, which he
says will take place as use of non-lethal weapons become more prevalent.
Other agencies need to examine this issue and the
bottom line�moving law enforcement agencies away from the traditional
means of subduing people involved in criminal behavior, he said.
"Police and correction officers have long
expressed a need and desire for alternatives to firearms, batons, and
hands and feet when confronted by violent or uncooperative suspects. In
the past 10 years this need has been expressed in a variety of
ways," adds the National Institute of Justice, which is a Justice
Department agency.
"What they are really saying is that if they
shoot you with a rubber bullet, you have less reason to complain of
brutality because no one is being killed," commented Sidney Grisso,
editor and publisher of African Unbound Magazine, in Silver
Spring, Md.
Such thinking still avoids how police abuse suspects,
even when death does not result, he said. Activists in Maryland have
mounted an anti-brutality campaign sparked by several deaths or beatings
civilians have suffered at the hands of police officers.
Critics also note less than lethal weapons were
supposed to be used during World Trade Organization protests in Seattle,
Wash., last year.
"Something went wrong in Seattle, because the
chief of police has resigned quietly," said activist Dick Gregory,
who adds that questions about long-term harm from such weapons have not
been answered.
The National Institute of Justice spokesperson
agrees, saying money to pay for research about health effects and field
trips to talk with officers about use of the devices is needed.
But, Ms. Newett added, that does not mean current use
of the weapons amounts to using suspects as human guinea pigs. |