Home | Subscribe To The Final Call | Books & Tapes e-Store| Letters/Contact Us | TV & Radio  

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2010 - 1:27:41 AM 

Front Page 
Minister Louis Farrakhan
National News
World News
Perspectives
Columns
Business & Money
Entertainment News
Health & Fitness
Technology
Features
Finalcall.com Español
FinalCall.com Web Video


Subscribe to FCN E-List

Enter email address:

Email Delivery Format:
HTML  Plain Text
Manage Your Subscription


The Untold Story
of Hurricane Katrina



Exclusive Webcast:
The Havana Cuba
Press Conference

FCN, March 27, 2006

 



Beware of Bush ‘help’ for Africa
By Nicole C. Lee
-Guest Columnist-
Updated Feb 18, 2008 - 6:15:00 PM

What's your opinion on this article?

 Printable page


Despite overwhelming opposition by African nations, the Pentagon has begun to restructure U.S. forces to bring the new Africa Command on line, with a headquarters on the continent and lily pads around the continent.
President Bush plans to travel to Africa Feb. 15-21. In his second visit to the continent, the president wants to “see firsthand” the fruits of U.S. efforts. Though the president and the State Department consistently boast of the increased benefits of attention paid to the Motherland, reality does not reflect their rhetoric.

For the fifth year, the president’s own flagship initiative for Africa the “President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief” (PEPFAR) will remain woefully underfunded. During his Jan. 28 State of the Union Address, Mr. Bush proposed funding for 2008 that will literally make it impossible for African nations to get ahead of the spread of the virus. His plan will make it possible to treat an additional 500,000 new infections in the next five years worldwide. This in the midst of a pandemic that will cost the lives of at least two million mothers, fathers, sons and daughters this year alone.

Limiting doctors and healthcare facilities on the African continent even further, President Bush has blocked every effort to increase the effectiveness of treatment dollars by refusing to allow countries to buy generic medications instead of costly name brand drugs. It is clear he is not serious about assisting people on the African continent.

What does President Bush take seriously? U.S. military positioning and control of the African continent’s natural resources. According to the National Intelligence Council, the U.S. is likely to draw 25 percent of its oil from West Africa by 2015, surpassing the Persian Gulf. Since the beginning of the Iraq War, President Bush has redirected over $1 trillion through the Department of Defense. Little known, however, is that defense funding increasingly includes monies for economic development, also known as foreign assistance programs. The administration is placing progressively more funding for humanitarian and diplomatic efforts, typically State Department functions, into the hands of the Pentagon. This dual initiative has come together in the form of the Africa Command, or AFRICOM.

Despite overwhelming opposition by African nations, the Pentagon has begun to restructure U.S. forces to bring the new Africa Command on line, with a headquarters on the continent and “lily pads” around the continent. These lily pads allow for “forward basing’’ of U.S. military enabling them to ignore national boundaries and political sensitivities.

In the face of opposition, the administration has begun to spin new stories lauding the benefits of good works completed by U.S. military forces in Djibouti, for example water wells and good roads for the poorest of Africa’s poor. However Djibouti which hosts the U.S. Combined Joint Task Force — Horn of Africa, remains a country strapped with political concerns and rampant disease with an average life expectancy of 43 years for its citizens. There is no evidence to support the presence of the U.S. military or tales that an American military presence automatically improves the lives of Africans.

The historical record cannot be disputed: U.S. military power has left nations devastated and unstable. Past administrations have underfunded vital programs, undermined indigenous democracies, backed vicious dictators and used the Africa continent as a playground for proxy wars. In short, there is little reason for U.S. military motives on African continent to be trusted.

The price of oil is at an all time high. The African continent is becoming an attractive investment site for many other growing economies, notably China. Africa’s governments and peoples know the Bush administration and its corporate allies want to ensure U.S. control over the continent’s vast resources.

Some have said this new attention will put the African continent more at the center of U.S. foreign policy. Administration officials have claimed that a U.S. military presence on the continent proves that Africa is important and central to the U.S. But, not all attention is good. Iraq and Afghanistan remain at the center of our Pentagon-driven foreign policy and we can all see the devastating, deadly results.

Nicole C. Lee is executive director of TransAfrica Forum. This commentary was distributed by NNPA.


 


FCN is a distributor (and not a publisher) of content supplied by third parties. Original content supplied by FCN and FinalCall.com News is Copyright 2009 FCN Publishing, FinalCall.com. Content supplied by third parties are the property of their respective owners.

Top of Page

Perspectives
Latest Headlines
Jews Scapegoating Blacks: A Long History of Hate
Lack of Bold Leadership on Jobs by Obama May Be Disastrous for Democrats
Dr. Laura will be back, radio host predicts
Anti-Islam lies and the loss of rights in America
A genocidal legacy of human trafficking uncovered
No more mosques in America?
If it Sounds Like Racism and Acts Like Racism, Then it Probably is Racism
HAITI: An Opportunity for a New Model
Why Have the ‘Cuban 5' Not Been Released?